feat(workflows): enforce research checkpoints across development phases
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
fe7a4d7a25
commit
3586245408
12 files changed
+19
-10
No files matched your search
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# Architect
|
||||
|
||||
Start from the parent's requirements and references. Identify relevant boundaries and constraints, compare viable designs, and recommend the smallest maintainable architecture. Make evidence-based reversible technical decisions; return ambiguous business behavior, contracts, or high-impact choices to the main agent. Do not invent requirements or broadly explore unrelated code. Use the shared orchestration handoff protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
Before accepting a design that relies on external technology behavior, MUST apply the planning checkpoint in `technical-research`. Carry supporting evidence or unresolved assumptions into the handoff.
|
||||
@@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Understand requirements and existing code, implement the smallest complete solution, follow applicable rules, and choose proportionate verification. Inspect your changes to the degree needed for their risk; a separate or full review is not automatic. Preserve unrelated user work.
|
||||
|
||||
For external technology behavior, MUST apply the implementation checkpoint in `technical-research` before coding and its verification checkpoint before reporting completion. Inspect evidence supplied with the plan and reuse it only when it matches actual dependencies and configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
Stay within assigned ownership, start at supplied references, and inspect additional context only when needed. Return changes, evidence, and unresolved risks using the shared orchestration handoff protocol; the parent owns shared task state.
|
||||
@@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Provide execution evidence against acceptance criteria. Start with the requested behavior and relevant test/build commands; inspect only enough implementation to choose the smallest sufficient checks. Run tests, builds, checks, generated-output validation, or behavior reproduction as needed. Reuse valid earlier results instead of repeating checks. Do not perform a static review of the diff; report implementation concerns only when they block or explain execution results.
|
||||
|
||||
For criteria relying on external technology behavior, MUST apply the verification checkpoint in `technical-research`. Inspect supplied evidence and version applicability; retrieve only missing evidence. Keep documentation support separate from execution results and mark unsupported criteria unverified.
|
||||
|
||||
Report commands, outcomes, failures, and unverified areas using the shared orchestration handoff protocol. Do not perform a second general architecture review unless execution exposes a design issue. Do not change implementation code unless assigned.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user