Files
MyAiConfiguration/shared/skills/community-marketing/references/community-models.md
T

64 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Community Models & Scaling Phases
The named model taxonomy, the flagship benchmark, and how the community-owner role changes as the community grows. Pair this with the goal playbooks and health metrics in `SKILL.md` — this file adds the *shape* of the community, not the tactics.
Source: Corey Haines, *Founding Marketing*, Ch. 12 — "Community connects customers with each other." The thesis: don't just sell software, create a movement. Community is an **audience-first** play — indirect, "deposits in a relationship bank account" — built on **community-led systems** and **recognition/rewards**.
---
## The 5 Community Models
Pick the model that matches the primary business goal. Most communities lean on one and borrow from others. Each has a "best when…" fit test and a real case.
### 1. Support-Driven
- **Best when…** support volume is high, questions are repeatable, and peers can answer each other faster than your team can. Goal: **support deflection**.
- The community exists so members resolve each other's problems, cutting ticket load while raising satisfaction.
- **Case — GreenPal:** ran a Facebook group where users and vendors helped each other, deflecting support away from the team.
### 2. Product-Development
- **Best when…** your users are technical or opinionated and their feedback directly shapes the roadmap. Goal: **feedback + build-in-public momentum**.
- The community is a feedback engine: feature requests, bug reports, and public traction all flow through it.
- **Case — Ydata:** ran a Slack community that drove **GitHub stars and product feedback**, turning members into co-builders.
### 3. Education / Enablement
- **Best when…** the product has a learning curve and activation/retention hinge on members getting good at it. Goal: **churn reduction**.
- The community teaches members to succeed with the product; competence lowers churn.
- **Case — LiveAgent:** used community education/enablement to **reduce churn** by helping customers get more capable.
### 4. Founder-Led
- **Best when…** you're early-stage, the founder's voice is the brand, and personal presence is the fastest way to build trust. Goal: **direct relationships + word-of-mouth**.
- The founder shows up personally — answering, hosting, setting culture — before systems can carry it.
- **Cases — Bento** (Discord) and **Postaga:** founders led their communities directly.
> The fifth "model" in practice is the blend: a community usually starts **Founder-Led**, then specializes toward Support-Driven, Product-Development, or Education as it scales.
---
## Flagship Benchmark: Notion's Ambassador Program
The reference point for community-led growth at scale:
- **300+ ambassadors**
- **1M+ template downloads**
- **25% of new users come from community referrals**
Use these as the "what great looks like" north star when sizing an ambassador program's potential — not as day-one targets. (For building the program itself, see the ambassador playbook in `SKILL.md`.)
---
## Scaling-Phase Role Shift
The community owner's job changes at each stage. Match your effort to the phase — running a 1,000-member community like a 50-member one (or vice versa) is the most common failure.
| Phase | Members | Role | Focus |
|-------|---------|------|-------|
| Foundation | 0–100 | **Community Architect** | Lay the foundation and build relationships — do things that don't scale, know members by name, set the culture. |
| Systems | 100–1,000 | **Community Manager** | Build systems and governance — rituals, moderation, onboarding paths, clear norms so activity survives without you touching every thread. |
| Scale | 1,000+ | **Community Enabler** | Enable others — stand up ambassador programs and sub-communities so members and leaders run it. You architect the leverage, not the conversations. |
**The shift in one line:** architect the *room* → manage the *systems* → enable the *people*. Each phase hands off the previous phase's manual work to structure and to members.